Practice Questions

What is the main conclusion of the argument above?

Identify the main conclusion and one intermediate conclusion in this argument. Explain how the intermediate conclusion functions.

Map the structure of this argument, showing how the reasons lead to the conclusion. Are all the reasons equally relevant to the conclusion?

Which of the following represents the strongest evidence for the claim that "regular exercise improves mental health"?

Identify and explain the flaw in the reasoning about evidence in this argument.

Evaluate the evidence provided for the effectiveness of the medication. In your answer, consider multiple factors that affect the quality and credibility of this evidence.

Which of the following is a necessary assumption of this argument?

Identify two assumptions that this argument relies on and apply the negation test to each.

Identify THREE distinct assumptions this argument makes and explain why each is necessary.

Which of the following is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?

Name and explain the fallacy present in this argument.

Identify THREE distinct flaws in this argument and explain how each weakens the argument's conclusion.

A health food company publishes a study showing that its own product reduces the risk of heart disease by 40%. Which factor MOST undermines the credibility of this claim?

Using the CRAVEN criteria, assess the credibility of Dr Patel's claim.

What is the function of "But research shows students can develop these skills in school without homework"?

Write an extended argument for the following conclusion, incorporating a counter-argument and rebuttal: "Social media platforms should be legally required to verify the age of all users."

Evaluate the analogy used in this argument. Consider both its strengths and any disanalogies.

Evaluate whether the principle supports the conclusion. Are there challenges to how the principle is applied here?

Evaluate the quality of this extended argument. What are its main weaknesses and how could it be improved?

Evaluate the claim: "Examinations are the most reliable way to assess student ability." In your response, present a balanced argument that considers evidence on both sides, identifies key assumptions, and reaches a justified conclusion.

What is the overall evaluation verdict you should reach about this argument?

Evaluate the overall strength of this argument. Consider both its strengths and weaknesses.

What is the most appropriate overall evaluation of this argument?

Which of the following is a valid deductive argument?

Explain why this argument is invalid, even if its premises were true.

What is the most significant weakness in the reasoning structure of this argument?

What flaw does this argument contain?

Which of the following is the best statement of the main assumption of this argument?

Which of the following is an example of a straw man fallacy?

A government minister claims that the new education policy has been a great success. Which factor MOST undermines their credibility?

Which type of evidence is generally considered most reliable in an academic argument?

This argument contains which flaw?

This argument uses which reasoning method?

In an extended argument, what is the primary purpose of acknowledging a counter-argument?

Which statement is an intermediate conclusion in this argument?

Evaluate the overall structure of this argument. Does the conclusion follow from the reasons given? Identify any assumptions and assess whether the middle-ground conclusion is adequately supported. [8 marks]

Which of the following is the strongest piece of evidence for the claim "exercise reduces the risk of heart disease"?

Critically evaluate the quality of this evidence and the conclusion drawn from it. In your answer, refer to sample size, representativeness, and the strength of the conclusion. [5 marks]

This argument is deductively valid. Which of the following best explains why?

Identify two distinct assumptions on which this argument depends. For each, explain why the argument would fail if the assumption were false. [4 marks]

Which flaw does this argument commit?

Identify the flaw in this argument and explain why it does not successfully dismiss the critics' objection. [4 marks]

A pharmaceutical company publishes a study showing its own new drug is more effective than competitors'. Which credibility criterion is most directly relevant to evaluating this study?

Compare the credibility of the two sources. In your answer, use at least three CRAVEN criteria. [4 marks]

Evaluate the credibility of each of the three sources and reach a conclusion about which evidence should be given most weight. [6 marks]

Which of the following is the best example of a counter-argument being properly acknowledged and then rebutted?

Write a well-structured counter-argument to this position, then write a rebuttal that defends the original claim. Your response should demonstrate command of counter-argument technique as assessed by Cambridge 9694. [6 marks]

Evaluate the strength of this analogy. In your answer, identify one relevant similarity and one relevant disanalogy, and explain their effect on the argument's strength. [4 marks]

This argument proceeds by analogy. Which of the following most effectively challenges the analogy?

Identify the conclusion and assess whether the reasons given are sufficient to establish it. Are any important objections left unaddressed? [4 marks]

Evaluate the quality of the counter-argument and its rebuttal in this extended argument. Does the rebuttal successfully address the counter-argument? [5 marks]

When assessing whether an argument is strong or weak, which of the following is the most important question to ask?

Write a full critical evaluation of this argument. Your answer should assess: the quality of reasons, use of evidence, any assumptions, and the overall strength of the conclusion. [8 marks]

Which of the following is an example of a hypothetical syllogism?

Identify the logical form of this argument. Is it valid? Explain whether the conclusion can be accepted with certainty, and identify any assumptions. [4 marks]

Evaluate the logical structure of this argument. Is it valid? Identify the type of argument form used and any weaknesses in its logical foundations. [6 marks]